Is the 2020 Season Going to be Cancelled?

So if you've been following the news at all recently you may have heard that the Coronavirus has arrived in Japan.  We don't have it as bad as China or South Korea yet but we are up there with Italy, Iran and Singapore in that list of countries where this is bad and likely to get a lot worse.  We've had 175 domestic cases so far, including in my prefecture, in addition to about 800 on the Diamond Princess cruise ship.

The Prime Minister, apparently on a whim, announced last night that all schools across the country will close from Monday.  So we had to break that to our son this morning.  Normally he loves missing school, but this means that the school year (which ends in March) is suddenly and unexpectedly over and he has to say goodbye to his teacher and friends today, so it was kind of a bummer.

Another question this epidemic has raised is whether or not organized sporting events will continue and it seems like the 2020 baseball season, or at least part of it, is at risk.  The NPB commissioner announced that all remaining pre-season games will be played before empty stadiums and he declined to confirm whether opening day, which happens in just 3 weeks, will go ahead as scheduled.

I am no medical expert but I don't really see any way, given how things have unfolded in China, that this is going to be resolved by the March 20 opener.  The Prime Minister just closed all the schools in the country until after that date so likely we are at best looking at a shortened season ahead.

At worst?  I don't know.  Hopefully this thing doesn't get too bad and gets under control before they have to cancel the whole season but it could come to that.  There is already a lot of talk about the possibility of cancelling the Olympics in July and if that happens I can't imagine the baseball season going ahead as planned.

Well, not that my concern over the baseball season is that big given that I don't want me or my family to get a deadly disease.  But since this blog is about baseball, that is what I'm focusing on.

I'm a bit hopeful that the worst won't play out.  They say these Coronaviruses don't do well in warm weather so hopefully when spring arrives it'll die down.  But there is so much unknown that its really impossible to say at this point and I'm just keeping my fingers crossed (mostly that my family doesn't get this, but also that the baseball season goes ahead).

Sets that are frustrating to collect: 1977-79 Nippon Ham version

 Welcome to another "Look at this card!" post.

Nippon Ham released a couple of sets in the late 1970s.  Between 1975 and 1976 they issued one with a very distinctive border along the bottom.  I have about a dozen cards from that set (out of over 350).  Its a tough set to collect in part becaue of rarity but also demand: lots of Japanese collectors seem to be chasing it down too.

Their second set they issued between 1977 and 1979.  Unlike the first one it has a design that is almost identical to Calbee cards from the same era: full bleed photo with a bit of identifying text on the bottom.  The dimensions of the cards are a bit different from Calbee so they are easy to spot despite this similarity.  You can read a bit more about the differences between the two Nippon Ham sets in Dave's post about them here.

I picked up this Koichi Tabuchi card from the 77-79 set recently, its the only card I have from that set and likely will stay that way.

Even though I'm a set collector I just can't get myself excited about the prospect of trying to complete a 1977-79 Nippon Ham set.  Partly there is a bit (no, a lot) of frustration with the fact that the set is not numbered (the "22" on the back of my Tabuchi is his uniform number, not the card number), so its insanely hard to keep track of them.

Another daunting prospect is that the exact number of cards which exist remains unknown.  Engel has the most comprehensive checklist at 285 cards, but also acknowledges this may not be complete.  Its hard to commit to a task (like collecting a set) without a clear sense of how big the task is.

Finally there is the fact that these cards are so hard to find, and expensive when you do, but look basically the same as Calbee sets from the same era which are a bit easier to find and more affordable.  At any given time there are probably only a handful of singles from this set for sale on Yahoo Auctions and at high prices, so even starting a set is almost impossible (no starter lots or anything like that ever become available).  With the more distinctive looking 75-76 Nippon Ham set, which has the same problem, I'm more willing to overlook that fault since the set is so different.  With the 77-79 set though I just think "Calbee cards, but way harder to find and way more expensive, no thanks".

So my Tabuchi is basically a type card for my collection.  And its a nice type card, so I'm happy with it.

Any other set collectors have similar sets you won't tough due to the "frustration" factor?

How do you keep a blog fresh?

I think my blog is getting into a rut.


My general rule of thumb with each post I make is that it should somehow be original, something that can’t be found elsewhere on the vastness of the internet.  Otherwise, why would anybody read it? 


Running a blog on a very niche topic is a pretty good way to make that task easy.  There are only a handful of other blogs or websites out there fully or partially dedicated to Japanese baseball cards, most of which you can find on my blogroll.  The small size of the community means there are massive gaps in publicly accessible information about Japanese cards into which a little blog like mine can step to help fill the void.  Blogs about American cards can’t just do a post along the lines of “This is what a 1987 Donruss card looks like” and expect anyone to care.  Japanese card bloggers can get away with that kind of post though since with a lot of major sets there isn’t any basic information online and putting it out there serves a purpose.


The downside to this is that it encourages a certain amount of laziness.  My blogging output recently has been almost entirely posts structured along the theme of “Hey look at these neat cards I have.” (See: post about these neat cards, and these neat cards and these neat cards and these neat cards and on and on and on).

Those posts feature cards about which there isn’t much info online so they tick my “Post must be contributing something original” box, but at the same time they collectively have started to give the blog a somewhat monotonous feel to it.  There are only so many iterations of that kind of post you can do before things just start to flatline.


I try to mix them up with posts in which I either analyze some broader issue in the hobby (like this one) or lay out some autobiographical story about my own collecting (like here).   I think they tend to be a lot more read-able and give the blog some much needed variety.  But the thing is, those types of posts require both 1) a good idea to ground them, and 2) a lot of time to compose.  Good ideas and free time are hard to come by.  "Look at this card" posts on the other hand don't require coming up with a new idea and can be dashed off in about half an hour.  

Ideas in particular seem to present a problem since the laws of diminishing returns kick in after a while.  When you start a blog, you have a pretty good inventory of ideas for things you'd like to talk about.  But over time you start using up those ideas faster than you replenish them with new ones, and eventually you just reach a point where you can't think of any great ideas but have a stack of neat cards and start to rely on them for most of your content, which is kind of where my blog is right now.

This post itself is evidence of that. Its one of my "idea" posts, the idea being that I'd do a post about how I am running out of ideas for posts.  Ironic, isn't it?

Out of curiousity, for all you other bloggers out there, how do you keep your blogs "fresh" over time?  Ever feel like you have run out of ideas and are relying too much on simple "Look at this card" templates for content? 

Menko Sheet Variations

 A few months ago I picked up two uncut sheets from the 1958 Mitsuwa Menko set (JCM 129) which had eight cards each.  There was some duplication on the sheets and I was kind of curious about how the cards were distributed on the sheets.  Its a 16 card set, but thanks to the duplication my sheets only gave me 13 out of the 16.

Last week I picked up another uncut sheet from the set which is similar to, but slightly different from, one of the two sheets I had previously bought.  Its the one on the right side of the above scan.  Its almost identical to the one on the left of the above scan which I already had, except for one card.

Can you spot the difference?

The Nagashima/Yoshida card on the left sheet has been replaced with a card of Atsushi Horiuchi on the right sheet.  The other seven cards though are the same and all in the same position.  Weird, huh?

Another oddity is that despite the differing fronts, the backs on each sheet are identical:

So there you go.  I'm very curious as to how many variations of these sheets there are out there and I'm going to keep on picking them up whenever I see them.  Unfortunately that is not an easy task, the three I have are the only three I've ever seen and Engel ranks the set as R2 on his rarity scale, so they are pretty hard to come by (especially in uncut form). My curiosity is piqued though so I'm going to keep at it.

Saburo Miyatake Find

This is a really neat card.

It features Hall of Famer Saburo Miyatake, one of Japan's biggest stars of the 1930s.  He was a kind of early Shohei Ohtani, both a star on the mound and at the plate.  His most famous exploits came prior to the formation of the NPB so he is better known from his days at Keio University (who he is portrayed with here, hence the "K") than his pro career.

This card is one of the oldest and rarest Japanese baseball cards of an identified player ever made.  Engel catalogs the set as JRM 42 and dates it to either 1929 or 1930, its the first set listed in the catalog's round menko section.

What is really neat though is that until I found this card there were only three known copies of it out there.  Now there are four, and of those four there are three variations.

In 2016 a copy of the card was sold on Prestige Auctions.  According to the description there were only two known copies of the card at the time.  Note though that the version of the card in that auction had him wearing a red uniform rather than the yellow uniform he wears on my copy:

Then in 2018 another copy of it was auctioned off at Prestige. But this one featured him in a green uniform:

The description of that lot notes the earlier red uniform one and describes this as a variation.  Now I've found there is another, yellow uniform variation of the same card!

This is not super surprising, a lot of early menkos used different colors for the same card.  But it is kind of odd to have so many variations in a card with a population of four (the red uniform version is the only one with more than a single copy out there).

Anyway, I'm pretty psyched to add this to my collection.

Clutter and Collecting: The Immortal 10,000 Idea

I’ve been trying to figure out what the ideal size for my card collection is recently.  This is a more urgent question for card collectors in Japan than it is in the United States. American homes have garages and basements, Japanese ones don't.  Nuff said.


At the moment my collection is kind of spread out in boxes shoved into little spaces here and there, most of them in a “spare” bedroom that is soon going to become a “daughter’s” bedroom (ie no cards allowed in the one place where until now I’ve been able to keep them), so managing the physical size of my collection  is an issue that has been brought into acute focus recently.


I have this idea for a simple, guiding principle to govern my collection from here on out which I thought I’d throw out there for anyone similarly concerned about their collection size (not limited to Japan).  


Like most card collecting ideas, this one comes from the ancient Greek historian Herodotus.  


About half of Herodotus’ work is devoted to  a history of the Greco-Persian war of the 5^th century BC.  The Persians in that war had this elite army unit which he calls the “immortal 10,000”.  Basically it was a unit that was always kept at a strength of exactly 10,000.  Whenever a solider died or was wounded he was immediately replaced by another soldier from the rest of the army, so this unit always had the same number, and they were always the best 10,000 the Persians had. One in, one out.  Simple. 


This struck me as a pretty good way of organizing a card collection too, at least if you’re concerned about keeping it a manageable size.  10,000 cards can fit into just two monster boxes, so its not too big.  At the same time, it’s a number that is big enough to allow you to still build an extensive collection – you could buy every Topps set from the 1970s and still have a few thousand more cards to go before reaching that limit.


The brilliance of applying that principle to a collection is the hard choices it forces you to make.  You can’t accumulate doubles.  Or junk wax stuff.  The guiding rule is when you hit that 10,000 card limit you can still buy cards, but for every new card you get you have to get rid of one.  This will, at least in theory, have a beneficial effect on a collection since you are constantly upgrading it, replacing cards at the lower end with cards you like better.  Over time your collection will become more a reflection of choices you’ve made about which card you specifically want in the collection rather than a reflection of how much random stuff you’ve bought over the years. 


I haven’t actually counted how many cards I have in my collection, but I suspect it’s a bit over 10,000 (likely not much over, I don’t think I have more than 15,000 at the most).  So I haven’t yet formally applied this principle to my collection, but I am already mentally allocating approximate card limits to each of my main collections.


10,000 keepers are:


5,000 cards for vintage Calbee, Yamakatsu, Nippon Ham sets I am working on.

2,000 vintage menko (all years)

1,500 Expos collection

1,000 remaining cards from my childhood MLB collection

500: Miscellaneous other stuff



Stuff to give up:


-All my remaining BBM stuff

-Going to stop collecting new Calbee sets each year

-All my doubles

-Some random MLB stuff I still have but don't want.



Stuff that I am tempted to try to use accounting shenanigans to allow me to keep them despite pushing me over 10,000:


-I have some partial Topps sets from the 60s and 70s which I haven’t worked on in years but can’t bear to let go of, yet can't fit them into the 10,000.  I may recategorize these as "collectible cardboard related products" or something.  


Anybody else like this idea and want to try it?  Lets see how far my willpower allows me to actually impliment this.  I suspect that a year from now I'll have decided to change it to an "Immortal 15,000" collection, but we'll see!

Holy Rocket Robots!

 I am just two cards shy of completing the "Rocket Robots" set, which is undoubtedly one of the best named sets of baseball cards ever produced.

Its an 8 card menko set released in 1975 (JCM 165 in Engel).  The cards are quite small, a bit smaller than a tobacco card from the T206 set.

Engel seems to have named the set owing to the fact that the backs of most feature pictures of robots (or possibly aliens or Kamen Rider characters?) and the names of various types of rockets printed at the top (though not all, only 3 of the ones I have do, the others say things like "Captain", "M4 Tank" and "Red Cross", which is a bit eclectic).

Interestingly 3 of the 8 cards feature members of the Chunichi Dragons (Senichi Hoshino, Morimichi Takagi and Takamasa Suzuki), which sort of continues an odd theme of the Dragons being over-represented in menko sets of the mid to late 70s (contrasted with the Giants being way over represented in the conventional card sets like Calbee of the same era).

The Sadaharu Oh card from this set is one of his most striking (and that is saying something, he is on a LOT of cards from the 70s).  The background artwork makes it look like he has a halo.  Saint Oh, guardian angel of the long ball or something like that.  The others are a bit more subdued but still cool.  Koichi Tabuchi shares his card with Isao Harimoto in the background.

Its kind of a neat set and one thing I love about 8 card sets is that you can fit them almost perfectly into a single binder page (a 9 card set would, of course, fit absolutely perfectly but they are a bit harder to come by).  So I've got two pockets waiting for the two I need (Takagi and a Koji Yamamoto/Sadaharu Oh combo card)!